Resource Search

Wealth brings with it some important considerations, including the obligation to have an approach to managing it. For families of significant wealth, it primarily revolves around the requirement to develop an investment strategy that ensures the wealth is maintained for future generations. It creates a shift in focus—one that takes an intergenerational approach and goes beyond the protection of capital in the short term.

In one way or another, every enterprise—and every investment—is impacted by gender, whether it be through the gender of those in leadership and governance positions, how employees experience workplace policies and practices, or how women are treated throughout the supply chain.

Interest in various forms of impact investing has been growing, but the array of terms—ESG, SRI, Green Bonds, and Engagement—in this area has contributed to investor confusion. The decision on which form is right for the investor depends on a number of factors, including the investor’s goals, beliefs, resources, and preferences. Though one agreed-upon process to evaluate environmental, social, and governance (ESG) investing actions may never exist, any proposed process should be practical, helping investors make informed decisions with both their time and capital.

Political events in 2016 gave rise to increasing nationalism and populism globally. Combined with a global slowdown in economic and trade growth, international integration may already have plateaued and could begin to reverse over the coming decade. Multinational organizations should prepare for potentially significant implications by carefully considering the political threats in the countries in which they operate.

The potential economic and development gains from gender equality are vast and well-documented—and yet they are currently being bypassed. This joint report with the United Nations Foundation explores the market potential of advancing gender equality. By investing in companies offering products and services that promote gender equality, investors can earn the “return on equality,” seizing profitable, under-tapped market opportunities. In fact, narrowing the global gender gap could add U.S. $12 trillion in annual gross domestic product.

Taking a closer look at the major market themes and strategic positioning for 2017, the view is slightly more optimistic than 2016, but includes many of the same themes that played out last year. Although there may only be a modest pickup in economic activity, equity markets should benefit from expectations of growth and strong corporate earnings. Given this backdrop, expect modest equity returns with developed economies outpacing emerging markets, interest rates to move modestly higher across the maturity curve, and bouts of volatility.

Anyone comparing diversified portfolio returns to domestic equity performance since the election may be disappointed, but this initial discouragement is misplaced. Instead, investors should remember the value of diversification and have confidence when positioning portfolios for the long term instead of reacting to current headlines. By taking this approach and holding onto recommended asset classes, investors can keep their eyes on the real prize of achieving their long-term wealth goals.

The acceleration of technological innovations and the challenges associated with adapting to them seem to point toward a tumultuous future. That future appears to be approaching faster than ever. Companies are finding it harder to maintain their positions in industries that are increasingly subject to disruption. And while investors may not be able to pinpoint precisely which companies or industries will lead the disruption—or fall victim to it—they should do what they can to plan to take advantage of these opportunities when they arise.

While currency traders were fixated throughout 2016 on the U.S. Federal Reserve’s outlook for short-term rates, we expect that changes in the value of the U.S. dollar in 2017 will be driven more by geopolitical events: most notably, the French Presidential election, a potential national election in Italy, as well as U.S.-China relations. In this edition of Global Foresight, we look across geographies, beginning with a focus on European politics and then a review of Japanese valuations. Jimmy Chang follows with an article on the U.S., China and emerging markets.

While the financial markets have moved well beyond the Global Financial Crisis of 2008, the public trust of a very large sector of the global economy is still severely marred due to continued bad behavior, lack of corporate transparency, accountability and proper risk management, as well as risky business practices. To overcome these shortcomings, the global investment community took on the role of “active stewardship” in capital markets.