When COVID hit, many business owners faced the dire realization that the insurance they paid so much for did not cover the business interruption resulting from the pandemic exposures. To help guard against that type of unexpected disruption in the future, many business owners have set up captives—a lucrative alternative risk financing structure—to navigate the risk and insurance challenges they face.
Resource Search
The C-suite faces tough operational obstacles as competition for talent remains fierce and employers experience higher-than-average turnover. In navigating the challenges, this report addresses the current and upcoming trends in healthcare, compliance and benefits, and provides practical solutions for employers to negotiate these challenges.
Corporate insiders pose a unique threat as they are given privileged access to the company’s assets and are trusted to use that access responsibly and ethically. However, this can go awry in several ways, from unintentional, negligent acts to intentional, malicious acts. To help prevent, detect, and respond to that threat, it’s important to address the three key risks when evaluating your Insider Threat Program.
Overall, the insurance market in Asia remained competitive in 2015, with rates remaining stable or decreasing in most lines of insurance. However, certain lines did experience rate increases and these were generally driven by loss experience, as in the case of the Tianjin explosion in August and its impact on property catastrophe-exposed coverage, or rising costs, such as has been seen in the medical malpractice and employee benefits lines.
Ample capacity and insurer competition generally put downward pressure on rates in most coverage lines in 2015, a trend expected to continue in 2016, barring unforeseen changes in condition. Other significant developments that bear watching throughout 2016 include demand for cybersecurity coverage across all industries, large-scale mergers and acquisitions, executive leadership changes, and recent announcements regarding potential and actual reinsurance underwriting.
Identity theft is a risk that continues to grow and change daily. Due to the many forms identity theft can take, including medical, credit, and financial, the threat remains prevalent and affects millions of people every year. Keeping up-to-date with the latest prevention methods is the surest way to protect the assets and identity. There are a number of steps that can be taken to reduce the risk of identity theft, including reducing access to personal information and maintaining a list of credit card issuers and phone numbers.
All businesses face cyber threats. Almost every company has some kind of network, database or online presence that puts it at risk for a cyber breach. Smaller businesses can be more vulnerable than larger ones as they often use third-party hosting and information processing that can be an entry point for cyber attacks. By following various proactive efforts, companies can protect their employees, their clients, the products, and their intellectual capital.
Each year fraudsters are stealing millions of dollars through sophisticated fraudulent use of Email Compromise Scams targeted at individuals and employees who regularly perform wire transfers. The scam involves a fraudster creating a false email or alternatively, hacking into a real email account of an executive, business partner, employee or financial advisor in order to generate a fraudulent request for a transfer of funds. The email is normally well designed and appears legitimate. Stay protected and secure by following preventive measures and developing good security habits.
Before executing a commercial property lease or sales contract, the parties may prepare a letter of intent or an agreement in principle. The letter of intent or a similar document (the “LOIs”) generally signals that the parties have agreed on the outline of a deal, but not on all of its provisions or details.
Wealth attracts attention and an increase in personal risk, including the risk of being kidnapped. Why then is there resistance to security among wealthy individuals and families, whether they come from security-savvy hedge fund managers or young parents of families with extensive financial holdings intent upon raising their children “like others” or “without special privileges”?